|
User
|
Comment
|
Date
|
| Burl Sowers |
we should be able to have whatever weapons we can afford the bad guys get whatever they want regardless so why restrict us |
|
| csc 1st503rd |
Taurus1; I can hit a target at 200 yards and beyond with my semiauto .308. They want all the guns. Unless we stand together the only legal firearms in this country will be 1700's era muskets. This is a fact. |
|
| csc 1st503rd |
Every tyranical act in the history of man came after the people in those societies were disarmed. remember that the civilians of the day had better quality and more accurate weapons than the government troops when the framers wrote the 2nd amendment. you're right to fear a government that wants to disarm the law abiding while protecting the criminals. it's not about hunting taurus,it's about liberty. I carried one in the service of this country. I see no reason why I shouldn't carry one as a citizen. |
|
| D.DOROGY |
USA-FREEDOM-FREEDOM OF CHOICE? WHOSE CHOICE-NOT MINE-I CHOOSE HK-BATFE SAYS "NO" WHY?-GERMAN?-OR JUST JUST FEAR SUPERIOR QUALITY & CRAFTMAN-SHIP- BETTER THAN "MADE IN AMERICA"-COLT,ECT.-EXAMPLE HK416 REMEMBER TO FEAR THE GOVT. THAT FEARS YOUR GUN- "AGAINST ALL THREATS FOREIGN "OR" DOMESTIC... |
|
| stan hester |
criminals commit crime, not guns |
|
| Ken Knight |
'Assault Weapons' statistically make for 1% of gun crime. Those who wish to ban them want Socialism instituted in the US and cannot have weapons in the hands of their American opposition |
|
| rt |
taurus1 the right to bear arms was not intended to protect hunters... |
|
| Ken Knight |
It starts with a gun-ban and it ends with a "ban" on certain people! |
|
| Ken Knight |
All "gun-bans" are impractical and create only more victims of crime |
|
| Jason Janacek |
Also, who wants to tell a woman that her husband was dead because he tried to come into my house to get my rifle? It would happen. I know many, many men that would die before they gave up ANY of their guns. Period. |
|