Login

→

Pros and Cons of the USP45?

By Yahoo Answers
2007-11-26 12:15:29
I am looking to buy my second handgun, and have been saving up to purchase something in the under-1000 range. I decided that I wanted a reliable large-caliber semi-automatic, and the USP happened to be a very appealing choice based on both performance and appearance. Before i go and purchase a full-frame .45acp USP, i just wanted to ask here what you all think about how they actually are to use? What is the recoil compared to a .357 mag revolver? What direction does the brass mostly fly, ever towards user? And last but not least, what are the overall pros and cons of this gun?
Answered By: nikomat77
They are great to use, generally you'll find that in most peoples view the only handgun that is equal to or superior to the Sig Sauer line is the H&K USP. Recoil is considarebly less than a .357 mag for several reasons; .45 is a much slower round with less energy than a .357 (i.e. less energy in both directions) and on top of the fact you have an action to absorb recoil the USP has a built in recoil reduction system. .45s tend to be a different recoil than a .357 anyway, more of a slow thud compared to the sharp fast crack of a .357. brass will fly back and to your right, the only reason it would fly toward the user is if your sevearly limp wristing, even then the brass usually will clear your head and go directly behind the shooter. keep your wrist firm and use proper technique and you won't have a problem. the pros......the usp is one of the finest combat handguns made, period. and you get an awesome new toy. the cons.....if your not used to semi-autos you've got some learning and adapting to do, ergonomics are completely different from a revolver(natural point of aim is much lower), field stripping and cleaning/lube is much more extensive, you'll have to learn to clear a jam/feed problem ect.
User: ChemEnerd
The USP is a nice pistol, however my favorite 45 is a Kimber 1911 style pistol. It is only single action but is much more accurate than a USP. The trigger on a Kimber is so much nicer than a USP or GLOCK. The USP and Kimber have less recoil than my S&W 357 revolver.
User: nikomat77
They are great to use, generally you'll find that in most peoples view the only handgun that is equal to or superior to the Sig Sauer line is the H&K USP. Recoil is considarebly less than a .357 mag for several reasons; .45 is a much slower round with less energy than a .357 (i.e. less energy in both directions) and on top of the fact you have an action to absorb recoil the USP has a built in recoil reduction system. .45s tend to be a different recoil than a .357 anyway, more of a slow thud compared to the sharp fast crack of a .357. brass will fly back and to your right, the only reason it would fly toward the user is if your sevearly limp wristing, even then the brass usually will clear your head and go directly behind the shooter. keep your wrist firm and use proper technique and you won't have a problem. the pros......the usp is one of the finest combat handguns made, period. and you get an awesome new toy. the cons.....if your not used to semi-autos you've got some learning and adapting to do, ergonomics are completely different from a revolver(natural point of aim is much lower), field stripping and cleaning/lube is much more extensive, you'll have to learn to clear a jam/feed problem ect.
User: crop13b
I love the USP45 a lot. It's been reliable for me and the recoil very manageable. But if its your first semi auto I'd go with a good 1911. You can get one cheaper than the USP45 with the same reliability. But if you really want to go with the USP instead, its a great investment and will serve you well.
User: H
Cons? None I can think of other than their price tag. What is the recoil compared to a .357 Mag revolver? Nil. Most .45 acps, unless they are built on an extremely light-weight platform, don't have any appreciable amount of recoil. Most .357's recoil will get your attention. Best. H

by Yahoo Answers